“Brooklyn teen sues NYPD officer for 2 false arrests”

From John Marzulli, in the Daily News: Brooklyn teen sues NYPD officer for 2 false arrests – NY Daily News.

It’s a deeply disturbing piece for a whole heap of reasons. These lines underneath the photo of Rayquan Callahan, the plaintiff, summarize it well:

Rayquan Callahan says a Brooklyn copy busted him for no reason, so he sued. Then the same cop, Daniel Berardi, busted him again — also for no reason.

I read the entire story with my usual guard against emotional jumps. But I can’t see the other guy’s — the policeman Daniel Berardi’s — side, so to speak.

It’s a bad time for the NYPD to have yet another lawsuit against a cop stopping, searching and, in the case, handcuffing and arresting a black kid for nothing.

By the way, I know Rayquan Callahan’s lawyer, Joel Berger, an excellent long-time civil rights attorney. Joel summarizes the case well when he says, “Never in 45 years of practicing civil rights law have I encountered such a brazen retaliation against a plaintiff by the very officer he has just sued.”

Although it’s important that the NYPD establish — or be forced to establish — different and restrictive rules for stopping and searching, I think the NYPD’s selection procedures, testing and training of police applicants need to be considerably revised if Daniel Berardi is an example of the people NYPD brings into the department.

This entry was posted in A. Why sue and who sues?, Law, suits and order and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.