Disturbing, yes, so why am I feeling rather strutty? Feeling like emitting a quiet form of braggadocio?
Because I learned about this a month or so ago. And, obeying the common social dictum, I saw something, and said something.
Over the past several months I’ve been finishing up Part II of my book, How I Learned The Facts of Life. Which I have indeed mentioned at least a few times.
Part I is The Facts of Life; Part II is, natch, The Fakes of Life.
I had quite a bit of material on fakes — bots, trolls, fake news and the like. I also had picked up some interesting research material on why people might believe fakes.
After I heard about the need for chaos from Harper’s Magazine Findings, I spent some time trying to find a definition of the Need for Chaos Metric and found corroboration of the political science study Harper’s referred to.
It was published in a political science journal, and co-written by two scientists from Denmark’s Aarhus University (Michael Bang Petersen and Mathias Osmundsen), and one from Temple University (Kevin Arcenaux). The title of the study adds a piece of critical information, which I’ve bolded: “A ‘Need for Chaos’ and the Sharing of Hostile Political Rumors in Advanced Democracies.”
The people who share such “hostile political rumors” are “status-hungry, and from socially marginalized groups.”
Which you’ll learn from reading Thomas Edsell, link above. But — I’m uncomfortable saying this — you heard it from me first.