{"id":10312,"date":"2012-09-08T14:51:43","date_gmt":"2012-09-08T18:51:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sidebarforplaintiffs.naomifein.net\/?p=10312"},"modified":"2012-09-08T14:51:43","modified_gmt":"2012-09-08T18:51:43","slug":"lawsuit-news-that-woke-me-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sidebarforplaintiffs.naomifein.net\/?p=10312","title":{"rendered":"Lawsuit news that woke me up"},"content":{"rendered":"

Although I’m certainly not clinical when I post info about new lawsuits, I do try to be fairly rational and unemotional. But this news, in yesterday’s Daily News<\/em>, West Village residents’ lawsuit takes aim at $1.2 billion natural gas pipeline project – NY Daily News<\/a> brought me to a (admittedly) knee-jerk reaction.<\/p>\n

The headline reads, “Fiery Fears: W.Side gas pipeline a ‘flamethrower’ – suit,”<\/strong> and then I glanced through it and saw this: “The opponents also said the trust can’t grant an easement near Jane St….” and I sat up and yelled “Jane Street! They’re going to run a new gas pipeline under Jane Street? Oh, no\u00a0 \u2014 not in my back yard.”<\/p>\n

The pipeline would carry gas resulting from fracking upstate in the Marcellus Shale. I did say my reaction was knee-jerk, right? Well, maybe not.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Although I’m certainly not clinical when I post info about new lawsuits, I do try to be fairly rational and unemotional. But this news, in yesterday’s Daily News, West Village residents’ lawsuit takes aim at $1.2 billion natural gas pipeline … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[337],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10312","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-legal-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t