Could it be? A sane decision on guns from a court?<\/p>\n
Yes. “A federal appeals court [10th Circuit, in Denver] has ruled that permits allowing people to carry concealed weapons are not protected by the Second Amendment.”<\/p>\n
I have nothing further to add. The New York Times article (via AP) says it all.<\/a><\/p>\n Oh. Except these two short paragraphs:<\/p>\n The National Rifle Association did not return a phone call seeking comment and Mr. [Gray] Peterson [the plaintiff] could not be located for comment.<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0I guess he’s concealing himself.<\/p>\n According to court records, Mr. Peterson had permits from Florida and Washington. Mr. Peterson said he was a frequent visitor to Denver and needed to carry a firearm during his visits.<\/em><\/p>\n The piece did not say why exactly Mr. Peterson needed to carry a gun during his visits to Denver.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Could it be? A sane decision on guns from a court? Yes. “A federal appeals court [10th Circuit, in Denver] has ruled that permits allowing people to carry concealed weapons are not protected by the Second Amendment.” I have nothing … Continue reading