Supreme Court, Kings County, IAS Part 5G<\/p>\n
Family Law<\/p>\n
Wife Fails to Show She Did Not Understand English; Vacatur Of Pre-Nup Agreement Denied<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
I picked up the above from the New York Law Journal today. I find it amusing, although the ex-Mrs. Gutherz did not, I’m sure.<\/p>\n
Definition of vacatur, from Black’s Law Dictionary: 1. The act of annulling or setting aside. 2. A rule of order by which a proceeding is vacated.<\/p>\n
In this case, definition 1 applies.<\/p>\n
It makes you curious, doesn’t it? How did Mrs. Gutherz attempt to prove to the court \u2212 unsuccessfully, apparently \u2212 that she didn’t understand enough English to know what she was signing when she signed the pre-nup? And how did Mr. Gutherz prove to the court that she did?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Supreme Court, Kings County, IAS Part 5G Norman Gutherz, Plaintiff v. Tatyana Filippova Gutherz, Defendant, 53786\/12 Family Law Wife Fails to Show She Did Not Understand English; Vacatur Of Pre-Nup Agreement Denied I picked up the above from the … Continue reading