{"id":23086,"date":"2014-12-08T18:50:41","date_gmt":"2014-12-08T23:50:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sidebarforplaintiffs.naomifein.net\/?p=23086"},"modified":"2014-12-08T18:50:41","modified_gmt":"2014-12-08T23:50:41","slug":"the-god-problem-in-seven-of-the-united-states","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sidebarforplaintiffs.naomifein.net\/?p=23086","title":{"rendered":"The god problem in seven of the United States"},"content":{"rendered":"

My goodness. I hadn’t realized that certain state constitutions ban people who do not believe in god from holding public office.<\/p>\n

First, I didn’t realize that 53 years ago there was a lawsuit:<\/p>\n

\u00a0ANNAPOLIS, Md. \u2014 A bookkeeper named Roy Torcaso, who happened to be an atheist, refused to declare that he believed in God in order to serve as a notary public in Maryland. His case went all the way to the Supreme Court, and in 1961 the court<\/a> ruled unanimously<\/a> for Mr. Torcaso, saying states could not have a \u201creligious test\u201d for public office.<\/em><\/p>\n

OK, good, so Mr. Torcaso won. Meaning I, too, won. So why do some states still maintain that atheists can’t hold public office?<\/p>\n

But 53 years later, Maryland and six other states still have articles in their constitutions saying people who do not believe in God are not eligible to hold public office. Maryland\u2019s Constitution<\/a> still says belief in God is a requirement even for jurors and witnesses.<\/em><\/p>\n

Now a coalition of nonbelievers says it is time to get rid of the atheist bans because they are discriminatory, offensive and unconstitutional. The bans are unenforceable dead letters, legal experts say, and state and local governments have rarely invoked them in recent years. But for some secular Americans, who are increasingly visible and organized, removing the bans is not only a just cause, but a test of their growing movement\u2019s political clout.<\/em><\/p>\n

Photo<\/span><\/p>\n
\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>
Todd Stiefel, the chairman of the Openly Secular coalition, said, “If it was on the books that Jews couldn’t hold public office, or that African-Americans or women couldn’t vote, that would be a no-brainer.”<\/span> Credit<\/span> David Walter Banks for The New York Times <\/span> <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Todd Stiefel, the chairman and primary funder of the Openly Secular<\/a> coalition, said: \u201cIf it was on the books that Jews couldn\u2019t hold public office, or that African-Americans or women couldn\u2019t vote, that would be a no-brainer. You\u2019d have politicians falling all over themselves to try to get it repealed. Even if it was still unenforceable, it would still be disgraceful and be removed. So why are we different?\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

So now, thanks to the New York Times<\/a>, I know where my service wouldn’t be wanted.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

My goodness. I hadn’t realized that certain state constitutions ban people who do not believe in god from holding public office. First, I didn’t realize that 53 years ago there was a lawsuit: \u00a0ANNAPOLIS, Md. \u2014 A bookkeeper named Roy … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[632],"tags":[672],"class_list":["post-23086","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-god-problem","tag-the-god-problem-2"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t