{"id":23953,"date":"2015-03-13T14:13:14","date_gmt":"2015-03-13T18:13:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sidebarforplaintiffs.naomifein.net\/?p=23953"},"modified":"2015-03-13T14:13:14","modified_gmt":"2015-03-13T18:13:14","slug":"more-email-news-a-lawyer-is-censured-for-one","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sidebarforplaintiffs.naomifein.net\/?p=23953","title":{"rendered":"More email news: a lawyer is censured for one"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Take a look at this abstract from the New York Law Journal, about an email one lawyer sent to another who happened to have been the forewoman of a jury that decided against the first lawyer’s client.<\/p>\n

I didn’t know this kind of a-legal vituperation was censurable. Not that I disagree; I just had no idea. (But I was curious enough to look through the lawyers code of professional conduct (you can link to it from the Sidebar<\/strong> first page, under Sites of Interest; if you too are curious, take a look at section 3.5(5)(iii and iv) on pages 107-108).<\/p>\n

So I figure you, too, would like to see this, especially given the Hillary Clinton email non-scandal. Some people delete their intemperate emails instead of sending them. Or make sure their emails aren’t intemperate to begin with.<\/p>\n

Lawyer Is Censured for Email Saying Juror ‘Hijacked’ His Case<\/em><\/h1>\n<\/div>\n

Joel Stashenko<\/a>, New York Law Journal<\/small>

\n
\n
The email, sent to a fellow lawyer who had served as forewoman of a jury that ruled against Frank Panetta’s client, began: “After numerous multi-million dollar verdicts and success beyond anything you will ever attain in your lifetime, I will never forget you: the bloated jury [forewoman] that I couldn’t get rid of and that misled and hijacked my jury.”<\/em><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Take a look at this abstract from the New York Law Journal, about an email one lawyer sent to another who happened to have been the forewoman of a jury that decided against the first lawyer’s client. I didn’t know … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[337],"tags":[149,4,30,380,487,310],"class_list":["post-23953","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-legal-news","tag-discovery-documents","tag-interpreting-lawyers","tag-lawyers","tag-lawyers-code-of-professional-conduct","tag-problems-with-lawyers","tag-role-of-judges"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t