{"id":24814,"date":"2015-05-22T16:07:39","date_gmt":"2015-05-22T20:07:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sidebarforplaintiffs.naomifein.net\/?p=24814"},"modified":"2015-05-22T16:07:39","modified_gmt":"2015-05-22T20:07:39","slug":"when-lawyers-fight-with-each-other-over-fee-sharing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sidebarforplaintiffs.naomifein.net\/?p=24814","title":{"rendered":"When lawyers fight with each other over fee sharing"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Split Panel Upholds Ruling in Fee-Sharing Dispute<\/em><\/h1>\n<\/div>\n

Ben Bedell<\/a>, New York Law Journal<\/small>

\n
\n

A Manhattan appeals court narrowly upheld claims by two lawyers against a third in a fee-sharing dispute, ruling the pair was entitled to 60 percent of the $2.6 million of the attorney fees in a personal injury case.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Split Panel Upholds Ruling in Fee-Sharing Dispute Ben Bedell, New York Law Journal May 22, 2015 \u00a0\u00a0 A Manhattan appeals court narrowly upheld claims by two lawyers against a third in a fee-sharing dispute, ruling the pair was entitled to … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[337],"tags":[866,4,867,247,171,487,249],"class_list":["post-24814","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-legal-news","tag-contingency-cases","tag-interpreting-lawyers","tag-lawyers-share-fees","tag-legal-contingency-cases","tag-legal-fees","tag-problems-with-lawyers","tag-what-contingency-means"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t