{"id":28414,"date":"2016-07-12T15:14:05","date_gmt":"2016-07-12T19:14:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sidebarforplaintiffs.naomifein.net\/?p=28414"},"modified":"2016-07-12T15:14:05","modified_gmt":"2016-07-12T19:14:05","slug":"was-it-possible-hillarys-server-gave-access-to-hostiles","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sidebarforplaintiffs.naomifein.net\/?p=28414","title":{"rendered":"Was it “possible” Hillary’s server gave access to “hostile”s?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Yeah, I’m still steaming over that Comey statement, with its suggestive opinions and fact-free ominous language.<\/a><\/p>\n

One pointedly egregiously extra-legal dark comment I’m quoting again from the Times story– “…it was possible that hostile foreign governments had gained access to her account”–bugged me especially (highlight the word “bug” as a pun). Because here I was, reading this article, and thinking, “Wait a sec. How many major hacks of big government agencies have there been in the past few years?” And “How many of those intrusions contained the words ‘Hillary’s emails’?”<\/p>\n

My memory regurgitated some big names, like the IRS, the State Department, maybe even Department of Defense, and wasn’t there a huge government agency that had millions of employees’ personal information, including Social Security numbers, stolen? (No, not Target. <\/a>Target is not a government agency, I don’t believe.)<\/p>\n

So, since I’m not a very lazy person, I’ve dug up some<\/em> stories–hardly all–about all those leaks and hacks and whatevers. And, yes, I was right: the phrase “Hillary’s emails” were not cited. Not once. Until, of course, James Comey spat that out at his news conference.<\/p>\n

Hang on to your hats. Here they are, starting with WikiLeaks:<\/p>\n