{"id":32865,"date":"2017-05-15T12:52:46","date_gmt":"2017-05-15T16:52:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sidebarforplaintiffs.naomifein.net\/?p=32865"},"modified":"2017-05-15T12:52:46","modified_gmt":"2017-05-15T16:52:46","slug":"bad-laws-in-our-nation-ruled-by-law-bush-v-gore-no-explanatory-note-needed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sidebarforplaintiffs.naomifein.net\/?p=32865","title":{"rendered":"Bad laws in our nation ruled by law: Bush v. Gore (no explanatory note needed)"},"content":{"rendered":"

11. Bush v. Gore (2000)<\/a>: You don’t have to be a Democrat to question the wisdom of this Supreme Court case. In a partisan split, the Supreme Court’s five Republican appointees halted the recount of contested ballots in Florida, handing the election to George W. Bush. Even Justice Sandra Day O’Connor has come to regret the ruling.
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

I have nothing to add. Can’t imagine why.<\/p>\n

Hold on. One thing to add: because of Bush’s inattention to a warning from a woman FBI agent, whose warning was not passed up the chain of command (possibly because her superiors were male), this.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

11. Bush v. Gore (2000): You don’t have to be a Democrat to question the wisdom of this Supreme Court case. In a partisan split, the Supreme Court’s five Republican appointees halted the recount of contested ballots in Florida, handing … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1095,1175],"tags":[1401,1425,738,868],"class_list":["post-32865","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-the-facts-of-life","tag-bad-supreme-court-decisions","tag-bush-v-gore","tag-scotus","tag-supreme-court-of-the-united-states"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t