{"id":34096,"date":"2017-07-22T13:00:29","date_gmt":"2017-07-22T17:00:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sidebarforplaintiffs.naomifein.net\/?p=34096"},"modified":"2017-07-22T13:00:29","modified_gmt":"2017-07-22T17:00:29","slug":"does-the-winner-in-a-lawsuit-get-his-legal-fees-reimbursed-by-the-loser","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sidebarforplaintiffs.naomifein.net\/?p=34096","title":{"rendered":"Does the winner in a lawsuit get his legal fees reimbursed by the loser?"},"content":{"rendered":"

In this case, yes.<\/p>\n

Source: Kentucky Must Pay $224,000 After Dispute Over Same-Sex Marriage Licenses – The New York Times<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

Remember Kim Davis? No–you couldn’t<\/em> have forgotten her! On the most abominably petty level, you (like me, confession) had to have been thinking, “Get yourself a decent hairstyle, girl!”<\/p>\n

\n
\n

A federal judge on Friday ordered Kentucky to pay more than $224,000 in legal fees and costs because one of its county clerks had refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.<\/em><\/p>\n

The order, handed down by Judge David L. Bunning of United States District Court, moved the protracted case one step closer to conclusion, about two years after the Rowan County Clerk, Kim Davis, defied a landmark Supreme Court ruling in 2015 and decided not to issue the marriage licenses.<\/em><\/p>\n

Ms. Davis\u2019s actions, which came at a watershed moment for gay rights advocates, reverberated across the country and led to lawsuits, the passage of a new Kentucky state law and resulted in Ms. Davis being briefly sent to jail for contempt of court.<\/em><\/p>\n

By Friday, Judge Bunning noted in his 50-page order, the case had finally \u201cboiled down to a single remaining issue: attorney\u2019s fees.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The fees became an issue after the Kentucky General Assembly passed a law in the spring of 2016 that removed county clerks\u2019 names from marriage license forms. The law rendered appeals connected to the case moot.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

But the plaintiffs in the case filed a motion for lawyers\u2019 fees shortly thereafter; a magistrate judge later recommended that the court deny the plaintiffs\u2019 motion for such fees.<\/em><\/p>\n

But in his order, Judge Bunning rejected the magistrate\u2019s recommendations, finding instead that the couples who had sued Ms. Davis had \u201cprevailed\u201d in the case, which entitled them to lawyers\u2019 fees.<\/em><\/p>\n

But Judge Bunning plunked the whole bill on the State of Kentucky’s desk. I would amend Judge Bunning’s decision slightly, to dole a percentage of those legal fees to Kim Davis personally–with a lien on her paycheck.<\/p>\n

(And maybe another percentage to Kentucky’s two quality senators, Rand Paul and…well, you know. Which isn’t possible, of course, I’m dreaming, but still.)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In this case, yes. Source: Kentucky Must Pay $224,000 After Dispute Over Same-Sex Marriage Licenses – The New York Times Remember Kim Davis? No–you couldn’t have forgotten her! On the most abominably petty level, you (like me, confession) had to … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1175],"tags":[1612,1611,1615,1616,1613,1614],"class_list":["post-34096","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-facts-of-life","tag-attorneys-fees","tag-kim-davis","tag-mitch-mcconnell","tag-rand-paul","tag-same-sex-marriage-licenses","tag-state-of-kentucky"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t