{"id":41067,"date":"2019-07-06T17:03:18","date_gmt":"2019-07-06T21:03:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sidebarforplaintiffs.naomifein.net\/?p=41067"},"modified":"2019-07-06T17:03:18","modified_gmt":"2019-07-06T21:03:18","slug":"whats-doin-in-the-federal-courts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sidebarforplaintiffs.naomifein.net\/?p=41067","title":{"rendered":"What’s doin’ in the federal courts?"},"content":{"rendered":"

The “act of wearing almost no clothing while serving coffee in a retail establishment” is not protected First Amendment expression, says the Ninth Circuit<\/a>. So no need to enjoin a pair of Everett, Wash. ordinances that require bikini baristas to dress more demurely.<\/em><\/p>\n

From John Ross in the Volokh Report<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The “act of wearing almost no clothing while serving coffee in a retail establishment” is not protected First Amendment expression, says the Ninth Circuit. So no need to enjoin a pair of Everett, Wash. ordinances that require bikini baristas to … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[337,1175],"tags":[4683,540,4167,4034,4161],"class_list":["post-41067","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-legal-news","category-the-facts-of-life","tag-bikini-baristas","tag-first-amendment","tag-john-ross","tag-ninth-circuit","tag-volokh-report"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t