I mean, something other than its official use involving my coop’s status vis-\u00e0-vis New York City’s local laws, laid out in a coop report. Which is where I found this marveous new acronym, currently applicable to the inspection and classification of our building’s fa\u00e7ade.<\/p>\n
It’s so, uh, Trumpian in its appearance and pronunciation, it must be adapted for something other than its current usage. Here it is:<\/p>\n
\u201cSWARMP\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n SWARMP<\/strong>. Like a fine (or lousy) wine, it has essences, hints of swamp aroma emanating from the massive slop which used to be the White House east wing, and\/or warped structural elements maybe in the non-existent golden ballroom. Or a swarm of maggots, crawling under and around the White House and gnawing upon all the corrupted flesh.<\/p>\n SWARMP.<\/strong> Too resonant, too magnificent to attach exclusively to the status of our building fa\u00e7ade. (Which currently is classified as the “S” in SWARMP, that is, “safe.”)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" I mean, something other than its official use involving my coop’s status vis-\u00e0-vis New York City’s local laws, laid out in a coop report. Which is where I found this marveous new acronym, currently applicable to the inspection and classification … Continue reading