Jury awards: what happens when a judge doesn’t like one

I’ve been kind of busy lately and am a week behind in Sidebar posts. But this lawsuit story in the Daily News caught my eye a few minutes ago, for a number of reasons.

First, the federal judge is Hon. I. Leo Glasser, whose name I have recognized and typed into documents at various times in my paralegal career. He always sounded like a solid and smart judge − and this decision supports my impression. And second, there’s a nice picture of him (I did remember that he’s sort of famous for wearing bow ties) and I’ve never seen him before so …

Anyway.  As John Marzulli, who covers the federal court in Brooklyn, begins this piece:

The verdict was a dollar and a dream.

A federal judge has tossed out a $900,001 award to a Manhattan man who claimed he was the victim of anti-Semitic harassment at an upscale catering company …

OK, so that sounds like a case, right? But do read on (EXCLUSIVE: Judge nixes $900G awarded to man who sued Mangia catering company over anti-Semitic harassment – NY Daily News.) because this poor victim of anti-Semitism had quite a few problems with his story, his case, his lack of evidence, his performance on the witness stand, et cetera. As Marzulli goes on:

Wiercinski’s [the, um, victim?] lawyer, Matthew Blit, told the jury that if his client had done anything wrong, “the judge had an obligation to do something about it.”

Glasser did. The judge referred a transcript of Wiercinski’s testimony to the Brooklyn U.S. attorney’s office [the same office that’s prosecuting Michael Grimm, hurrah hurrah] for investigation…

Indeed, I can’t figure out what the jury was noshing on in the jury room when it coughed up this award. And, yes, you’re right: it’s unusual for a judge to throw out a jury award. Usually, a questionable case and a mammoth award heads to the appellate judges who are the ones to toss ’em, as I’ve pointed out a few times before.

There are a number of excellent plaintiff lessons to learn in this story, along the “don’t do this!” line.


This entry was posted in J. Judge and courtroom, Law, suits and order, O. Settlement or verdict, Q. Appeals and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.