How and where do you get your facts from the news?

We all worry about whether we know enough. And there’s a lot to know.

But if you watch Fox for your news, you don’t worry. You’ve got nothing much to worry about. A recent study shows you don’t know much about anything.

Nick Kristof’s column today is entitled, “Fox News? More Like Trump’s Impeachment Shield.” In it, he refers first to the way Fox covered this week’s impeachment hearings.

With Rep. Adam Schiff on the screen, Fox News’s graphic declared in all caps: “TRUMP HAS REPEATEDLY IMPLIED THAT SCHIFF HAS COMMITTED TREASON.” At a different moment, the screen warned: “9/26: SCHIFF PUBLICLY EXAGGERATED SUBSTANCE OF TRUMP-ZELENSKY CALL.”

Fox downplayed the news and undermined the witnesses. While Ambassador William Taylor was shown testifying, the Fox News screen graphic declared: “OCT 23: PRESIDENT TRUMP DISMISSED TAYLOR AS A “NEVER TRUMPER.” It also suggested his comments were, “TRIPLE HEARSAY.”

Now, anybody’s who read my book, How I Learned The Facts of Life, knows precisely what to do with those paragraphs. Well, I’m not quite finished with the book so nobody except me has read it. Therefore, I’ll show you what to do with Fox’s graphics if you are really in pursuit of the facts:

1. Look at those capitalized sentences. Although it may be a “fact” that Trump implied what he did — in another context, Schiff could sue him for defamation and win — it isn’t a fact that Adam Schiff has “committed treason.” Nor does this have anything to do with the facts brought out in the hearings.

2. Schiff did publicly mock the substance of that notorious call in response to Trump’s repeatedly saying it was “Perfect.” Satire is neither treasonous nor a lie. It is, however, enraging to people without a sense of humor. They take mockery personally. In this case, of course, correctly. Or maybe I should say “perfectly.”

3. As for the next capitalized sentence about Ambassador Taylor, see my dissection at number one, above. And again, it does not report the factual substance of Taylor’s statements.

4. “Triple hearsay”? No such thing, not here. Except when they report what Trump said as if his outrageous opinions were factual. That’s sort of hearsay.

So let’s go on to what such TV “reportage” does to Fox viewers’ minds:

Researchers have found that Fox News isn’t very effective at informing Americans. A 2012 study by Fairleigh Dickinson University reported that watching Fox News had “a negative impact on people’s current events knowledge.”

The study found that those who regularly watched Fox News actually knew less about both domestic and international issues than those who watched no news at all. N.P.R. listeners were particularly well-informed, the study found, but even people who got their news from a comedy program like “The Daily Show” — or who had no news source whatsoever — knew more about current events than Fox viewers.

Oh gee whiz.

If knowing nothing about current events — or nothing factual — gives you peace of mind, do re-read what I told you about the Dunning-Kruger Effect:

The Dunning-Kruger Effect: the cognitive bias of illusory superiority.

The Dunning-Kruger Effect explains that many people are not merely ignorant: they are unaware of being ignorant. Their brains do not accept that they are uninformed.

They think they know all there is to know. Or, rather, they think they know all they need to know to be smart in their own intimate world.

Unlike a lot of us, who spend considerable time reading, absorbing information and double checking the information for accuracy, because we’re aware we don’t know everything.

I suggest to anyone who gets all his news from Fox, don’t emerge from your foxhole in search of someone to talk to about what’s genuinely going on this world. It’s too complicated. And it’ll probably make you anxious.

 

 

Posted in Impeachment, Politics, The Facts of Life | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on How and where do you get your facts from the news?

Just to prove to doubters I can get outraged every minute of every day

Woman calls 911 when her ex-husband (who had repeatedly attacked and threatened to kill her) breaks into her Dallas home. For 17 minutes, she screams for help on the phone. But police take nearly an hour to arrive, after making a pitstop at a convenience store. When they do show up, they knock, but there’s no answer, so they leave. Her family finds her body two days later. Fifth Circuit: No constitutional violations here.

–From John Ross at Volokh Report

Posted in American war on women, J. Judge and courtroom | Tagged , | Comments Off on Just to prove to doubters I can get outraged every minute of every day

Another thought about those “secret hearings”

The Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee have been griping publicly about the closed door hearings. They’ve accused Democrats of shutting them out, not releasing transcripts and a whole heap of other wrongs.

Well, we all should know this is bollocks.

The Republicans have members in those hearings. The members can ask questions, as they do in the open hearings. Then the court reporter taking down the testimony transcribes it. Each testimony transcript is released after it is reviewed and signed off on by the witness who gave it. This can take a few days or more.

Then all members of the committee — including the Republicans — get copies of the transcript.

Subsequently, once a witness is summoned to an open hearing, the Republicans have the same time to question him or her as do the Democrats.

One thing that hasn’t been emphasized about this:

I see the closed door testimony as equivalent to the deposition phase in a civil legal matter. During depositions, lawyers are pretty free to ask all sorts of questions — questions that may eventually be barred by the judge if the matter goes to trial.

After the testimony is transcribed by the court reporter, the lawyers receive a copy of the testimony transcript and get to plunk it down on their desks and study it. They read it thoroughly and make notes on anything they see as a weakness or a strength in the witness testimony. They prepare to examine or cross the witness at trial by probing into those weaknesses or strengths, depending on what side they’re on.

So the closed door hearings are a sort of rehearsal for the big show. They provide valuable information for the lawyers. Some of which are those Republicans who are complaining.

The Republicans who kvetch about those “secret hearings” are either too lazy to have reviewed the transcripts effectively for the public hearings, or have found no weaknesses in the witness testimony to probe in their public cross-examinations.

So when Jim Jordan, et al, yell about those closed door hearings, he’s really yelling that he hasn’t read the transcripts, or his staff hasn’t found anything to challenge.

All that yelling is a confession of incompetence and/or failure.

Posted in Impeachment, K. Discovery, L. Depositions, Politics, The Facts of Life, Trump Stuff | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Another thought about those “secret hearings”