Why the majority must vote en masse in November 2018. And forever after.

From 538 Significant Digits:

8 states

By 2040, eight states will be home to nearly half (49.5 percent) of the country’s entire population. An implication of that bit of trivia: 30 percent of the American population will control 68 percent of the American Senate. “The House and the Senate will be weighted to two largely different Americas,” the Post writes. [The Washington Post]

Posted in Politics, The Facts of Life, voting rights | Tagged | Leave a comment

Rats! We have to go back to the facts about Hillary’s emails?

I’ve got ever so many reasons why I can’t bear listening to Trump but when he launches himself, without any prompt, into his thing about Hillary’s emails, I start to growl. Because it’s clear he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Someone programmed “Hillary’s emails” into his mouth and he opens and out it comes.

So let’s go back to the facts.

The above link is long, so I’m going to extract the part that seems most likely to correspond to the “30,000 Hillary’s emails” nonsense. Here it is. And it, too, is long. But less long than the entire link:

Fourth: Emails Hillary retained (along with personal email correspondence) on her private server. Half of these emails related to her work as Secretary of State. It’s my understanding that a majority, if not all, of the State emails were also on the State computer system.

Those emails were the subject and object of the FBI investigation. The FBI mandate was to review whether any government emails were marked “Classified” and, thus, should not have been transferred to or from a private server, i.e., Hillary’s.

Despite Comey’s propensity for inappropriate church-y theatrics, the FBI did not discover any classified emails.


So what’s the problem?

There isn’t one, except in the minds of conspiracy lunatics.

Let me delve into the times I was at least peripherally involved with the discovery of massive numbers of documents in lawsuits, during which I came to understand the general intra-party procedures for reviewing and turning over such documents.

I’m going to apply what I experienced to what I believe must have happened during the Hillary email FBI investigation.

  1. FBI lawyers contacted Hillary’s lawyers, probably in an official written discovery document, demanding that emails on Hillary’s server be turned over to them.
  2. Hillary’s lawyers responded to the FBI lawyers and said, “OK, but our initial review shows us there are maybe 60,000 emails, half of which are her personal correspondence. Don’t you agree it’d be far more efficacious for us to turn over only the State Department emails you’re requesting?” They’d suggest that as a first move they would review them all, come up with a log or something and give the FBI the log.
  3. In response, the FBI lawyers would eventually have said something like, “OMG! Yes, thank you.” Because otherwise, the FBI lawyers and a large staff would have to read through 60,000 emails. So why not have the other side cull this mass of paper?
  4. Now, why would FBI lawyers trust Hillary’s lawyers to do this work? Conspiracy-minded propagandists don’t understand or don’t want to understand that lawyers are officers of the court (Black’s Law Dictionary definition, my bolding):

A person who is charged with upholding the law and administering the judicial system. Typically, officer of the court refers to a judge, clerk, bailiff, sheriff, or the like but the term also applies to a lawyer, who is obliged to obey court rules and who owes a duty of candor to the court.

5. Which means that the FBI lawyers and Hillary’s lawyers shared an implicit trust. So when Hillary’s lawyers said, “Let us separate the State Department stuff from the personal stuff,” the FBI lawyers said, “Sure.”

6. If at any stage of this process the FBI lawyers felt anything was being withheld from them, they would have gone to court and asked that a judge get involved. I’m not sure there was a judge; if the FBI was getting along smoothly with Hillary’s lawyers, they wouldn’t have requested that a judge get involved.

(7. If either the FBI or Hillary’s lawyers asked that a judge be involved, the questioned emails could have been turned over to the judge under seal, i.e., to be read only by the judge and her staff. Which means the judge’s staff would have had to go through all of them to determine which, if any, could be excluded. 60,000 emails. Irritated sigh from judge and even bigger sigh from her small staff. Long delay in investigation.)

8. More likely, all the lawyers came to an agreement: Hillary’s lawyers would read every email, make a log separating relevant from personal emails, and turn over the relevant emails (and log) to the FBI.

9. The “30,000 missing emails”? They were never missing — not by the FBI, at least. The FBI had full access to all the emails they needed to review in order to come to the conclusion they did: our security had not been compromised by Hillary Clinton and her private server. Which, by the way, is the only server I’ve heard of that did not get hacked by the Russians.

10. Once those 30,000 emails were bilaterally determined to be personal and irrelevant to the FBI investigation, Hillary’s lawyers could do whatever they wanted with them. Make a big collage or paper planes or zillions of origami swans, or a bonfire…

They were Hillary’s emails, not the government’s. Unlike the emails Trump’s people are in an uproar over–emails which were government owned and therefore openly available to Mueller and his team.

Yes, that last was a gratuitous swipe.

This is what I believe happened with the FBI investigation of Hillary’s emails. I’m not a lawyer, though, so if any lawyer wants to comment — confirm or critique — I’d be pleased to publish it.



Posted in American war on women, Politics, The Facts of Life | Tagged | Leave a comment

Dark money is going noir

Steve Mnuchin (he prefers to be called “Steven”) and the IRS (which prefers to be called “the IRS”) have just decided that Koch Bros*, et al dark money groups will no longer have to disclose their donors’ names to the IRS.

Here’s how Mnuchin described it:

“Americans shouldn’t be required to send the I.R.S. information that it doesn’t need to effectively enforce our tax laws, and the I.R.S. simply does not need tax returns with donor names and addresses to do its job in this area,” Steven Mnuchin, the Treasury secretary, said in a statement on Monday evening.

So many things to critique in that statement. So many.

Of course, Congress, our legislative body, can do what they’re supposed to do: legislate. Write a law to impose disclosure requirements.

Because, you know, without ANY remaining disclosure requirements, we will not know who is shoveling money into those PACs. The Russians? Why not? Apparently they’ve been allegedly handing money to the NRA which, in turn, donates it to GOP candidates.

So. Where are we?

The next Mueller indictments should be naming the NRA, but that might wait until after Roger Stone, Julian Assange, some congressperson(s), some Trump campaign official(s), yadda, yadda, yadda (that’s Russian for “coconspirator” three times).

*I should start referring to the Koch Bros as the Koch Bro. David Koch has dropped out of everything because he’s ill, leaving only Charles, the most rabid Koch.


Posted in Koch Bros Final Solution to Democracy, Mueller investigation, Politics, The Facts of Life, The filthy rich | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment