Living with myselves…plus some dogs

You read that correctly: “myselves.”

I live alone. Sure, I have had boyfriends but never a live-in husband. Years ago, after many of my friends had been hitched for quite a while, had kids and disrupted my world view of love by telling me they were splitting up, I used to say, “By not getting married for the first time, I’ve cleverly avoided my first divorce.”

Truth is, I never found someone I wanted to marry. And although I adore kids, I’ve never had the urge to have my own. It takes an act of monumental courage to have children. I’m sort of a coward.

So I live alone. When you live alone, you talk to yourselves. I have a number of chatty selves. For instance, the DIY Self is currently planning to clean the window where a large bird shat. The Writer Self is at this very moment telling you about my DIY self. And the Avid Reader Self spends a huge amount of time on Bluesky to avoid cleaning that window.

I have other selves, too, and they talk to each other a lot, often out loud. If you saw me doing this, you might think I was nuts, but if you saw me doing this, I wouldn’t be doing it because I’d be talking with you.

Sometimes, I talk out loud to myself when I’m out walking, but since I live in a neighborhood where plenty of actors and writers live, I can pretend I’m (a) rehearsing a scene or (b) working out dialogue for my latest novel. (I’m not writing a novel.)

Or I could get a dog and tell it about my latest revelations but I’d probably start talking in that weird voice people use when talking to dogs, when they sink their pitch way low to say, “What a goooood booooy.”

Recently, I was standing on a corner waiting for the light to change. Next to me was a wiry little man with a large, elderly beagle who seemed fairly morose. I heard the man say to the beagle, “We’re going to find a doggie park.” Light turned green and the three of us crossed the street. On that far corner, I heard the man say to the beagle, “Now you know the rules. Six or ten feet away from the other doggies.”

One day I saw a woman standing at the curb with a very small, black doggie – the kind with no expression whatsoever on its cute little face. Looking across the street, the woman saw someone coming and said to the dog, “Look who’s coming! Mommy’s coming!” The dog did not look at who was coming, did not look at the woman exhorting it, did not move at all.

I react more when talking to myselves than those dogs did.

Yes, I hear you saying I could get a cat, but I’m allergic and, as you know perfectly well, a cat wouldn’t pay attention to me anyway.

Years ago when I got panicky about being alone I went to my psychiatrist. I told her I had to learn how to be happy alone because otherwise I’d just wind up with a guy who was wrong for me, just to avoid being alone.

I learned how to be happy alone. But I still picked guys who were wrong for me. My Romantic Self still doesn’t have good judgment about men.

During COVID, living alone had benefits. First, I could stay indoors with myselves without getting stir crazy or lonely. Second, I didn’t have to go through manic cleaning as did fellow residents. When I came home from a walk or a shopping trip, I didn’t worry about washing off my packages, or wiping the bottoms of my shoes or the feet of my dogs.

I have a neighbor who told me she dusted her apartment every day and no longer would go out for walks. Why? Because people on the sidewalk didn’t keep their six-foot distance. They just walked on, paying no attention, and walked right at her!

I said, “Well, some people don’t pay attention. I just step to the side to create that protective distance.”

“But they don’t do that for me!” she cried.

Nothing to add.

Posted in Animal news, COVID-19, The Facts of Life | Tagged , | Comments Off on Living with myselves…plus some dogs

What sperm “space” are they talking about??

Once again, Harper’s Weekly Review presents a news item containing unexplored mysteries which provoke quite a few questions:

[R]esearchers announced that human sperm struggles to navigate in space.

What space is that? Corporeal or outer?

If outer, what a concept for an animated film for kids about a miniscule sperm somehow launched into outer space! Which just made me realize it had to be from a space walk by a male astronaut who somehow managed to masturbate out there, sending his teeny guy off on an adventure. No info about what happened to his exposed organ during his ecstasy.

All we need is a name for the teeny sperm who, dauntless (because what else could he be?), is navigating through space.

Also, since Harper’s uses the singular form of the verb “struggle,” shouldn’t the sentence read, in part, “...a human sperm struggles…”? Either that or “human sperms struggle.” Do they mean that they’ve studied only one human sperm?

Announcement: “Human Sperm to Star in Animated Film!”

Another Announcement: “Audition for Voicing A Sperm in Upcoming Animated Film!”

Posted in Culture, News media, Science, The Facts of Life | Tagged , , | Comments Off on What sperm “space” are they talking about??

How to do diplomacy in the face of war

Like you, I read about (or maybe just skim over) Trump’s egregiously wacky jabs at convincing everyone he knows what he’s doing. One of the many things he knows nothing about is diplomacy, which demands a grasp of reality he does not have.

Pure coincidence that I just finished reading a history in which a world-changing diplomatic negotiation takes place, a phased-in diplomacy which I believe must be the exemplar for all such international conflicts today. (As I read it, I couldn’t stop my brain from zipping off occasionally to Trump and his incompetence, as a way of doing that old school essay instruction to “compare and contrast.” I compared. I screamed.)

I’ll try to give you the essence of this amazing event, which developed over a period of weeks:

Two countries were at war over land. It happens, right? One country had moved onto the land, signed a lease-purchase agreement with the original inhabitants, and had settled in to become a functional entity at a high level.

The other country had decided, as countries have done over the millennia, that it somehow had the right to that land. (After a recent read of a good world history, I’ve come to the conclusion that most wars, if not all wars, are started by such faux righteous thieves, usually by violent land grabs.)

In this instance, the would-be invasive force established a strong naval presence right in the face of the weaker but doughty military presence of the defenders.

The uneven stand-off produced the expected threat from the offense and expected resistance from the defense. “We are going to own you; ergo, just surrender.” The defense response: “We will fight with all our power to the death.”

“Then you will force us to destroy all of you, your whole population.” Response: “Fuck you.”

You’d expect this, wouldn’t you? Knowing what I had learned about the strength of one side and relative weakness of the other side, I read with growing anxiety, even though I already knew the ending. Until one word, a magic word, appeared in the written exchanges between the two. The word: “However…”

“However,” used by both sides, kick-started a complex negotiation in which Force One did take ownership of the land, but Force Two remained on the land, protected its people, its culture, its possessions, its property — and its laws, although it gave up its name.

Strange thing, a war in which no one was killed and both sides got pretty much what they wanted. Hmm.

What’s so remarkable about all this is that it took place in 1664, on the shores of Manhattan Island, and on the two rivers which created it.

Without email or encrypted apps or Zoom, the whole negotiation was conducted in formal correspondence to and from Peter Stuyvesant and Richard Nicolls (known to his close friends as “Rich” — really), the English colonel and master of the four warships which pulled up in Hudson Bay. And that correspondence was transmitted to and from Nicolls ship and Stuyvesant’s fort by…rowboats, carrying each side’s advisors. Who also talked to each other.

But as I read it — it’s kind of a thriller — it was nearly impossible to believe it hadn’t happened yesterday; that’s how modern it seemed. How rational, even when threats of violence were rowed back and forth, along with that resonant word, “however.”

As the author of Taking Manhattan:The Extraordinary Events That Created New York and Shaped America, Russell Shorto, puts it, New York and our deeply oddball country began with this merger between the Dutch and the British.

I’m not doing justice to this marvelous book, the sequel to The Island at the Center of the World: The epic story of Dutch Manhattan and the forgotten colony that shaped America.

If you pine for rationality in our current state of delusional exhibitionist displays, read the book yourself. It will inspire you and reinforce whatever dwindling belief you might have in the capacity of human beings to reason.

 

Posted in Capitalism, Culture, Government, Immigration, The Facts of Life, Trumpism, War | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on How to do diplomacy in the face of war