Search all posts
-
Most Recent Posts
Sites of Interest
Category Archives: Human rights
Hey doctors, it’s time for active resistance
I’ve been reading too many stories about doctors and hospitals which, when faced with women having miscarriages or ectopic pregnancies, call a lawyer first, or stand around wringing their hands in case saving lives is…barred by state law. This perplexes … Continue reading
Posted in Human rights, Judiciary, Pro choice, Racism, The Facts of Life, Trumpism, War on women
Tagged abortions, active resistance, American Medical Association, anti-abortion laws, doctors, ectopic pregnancies, miscarriages, passive resistance, physicians, physicians' moral codes, pregnancies
Comments Off on Hey doctors, it’s time for active resistance
What an education we’ve been getting since Nov 2016!
I just read Marc Elias’s article on the Materiality Provision of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. And I thought, gee whiz, I never knew about this fascinating aspect of a law I sort of thought I understood — but … Continue reading
Posted in Government, Human rights, Jan 6, Judiciary, Law, suits and order, Lawyers, political campaigns, Politics, The Facts of Life, Trumpism, voting and voting rights, War on women
Tagged Civil Rights Act of 1964, Marc Elias, Materiality Provision
Comments Off on What an education we’ve been getting since Nov 2016!
How can we confront this bizarre, destructive SCOTUS?
One word answer: Bedazzled. I had a lot of gun control ideas along this line but the New York State Legislature beat me to it — at amazing speed. Still, I want to offer the Bedazzled lesson as lanolin* for … Continue reading
Posted in climate change, Corruption, Guns in the U.S. of A., Human rights, Judiciary, Law, suits and order, Politics, Pro choice, The Facts of Life, The god problem, voting and voting rights, War on women
Tagged Article I of the Constitution, Bedazzled, constitutional crisis, Dudley Moore, Eleanor Bron, Guarantee Clause, Jamelle Bouie, lanolin, Peter Cook, Supreme Court
Comments Off on How can we confront this bizarre, destructive SCOTUS?