Search all posts
-
Most Recent Posts
Sites of Interest
Tag Archives: Interpreting lawyers
Legal terminology: what IS a condemnation?
Here’s why laymen like me, otherwise literate, are driven nuts by legal terminology. What is condemnation? What does it mean? Well, obviously, it’s…but never mind. We’re not talking about the obvious. We’re talking about the legal. We’re talking “condemnee” and … Continue reading
Posted in Law, suits and order
Tagged condemnation, de facto, de jure, eminent domain, expropriation of property, how lawyers drive clients crazy, Interpreting lawyers, legal language, statutes of limitations
Comments Off on Legal terminology: what IS a condemnation?
Lawyers must consult client before making deal
Adrian Arrington, the lead plaintiff in a class-action lawsuit against the N.C.A.A., said his lawyers had agreed to the deal without his knowledge. Source New York Times: Former Player Opposes Settlement in N.C.A.A. Concussion Suit CHICAGO — A proposed settlement … Continue reading
Posted in Law, suits and order
Tagged class action lawsuits, client-lawyer communications, how lawyers drive clients crazy, Interpreting lawyers, lawyer-client communications, problems with lawyers, Talking to plaintiffs
Comments Off on Lawyers must consult client before making deal
Tell me again: why are legal documents so hard to understand?
I’ve written about the difficulties people like me, i.e., laymen, can have in comprehending legal language, even in our own complaints. I’ve also given a reason for this, which I got from a really brilliant lawyer. Yesterday, in the New … Continue reading
Posted in Law, suits and order
Tagged how lawyers drive clients crazy, Interpreting lawyers, Law and government agencies, legal language
Comments Off on Tell me again: why are legal documents so hard to understand?