Facebook has slapped at me! How am I feeling?

Chuckling-ish.

As I entered Facebook just now, a large stern notice filled my screen. It said I was being punished, restricted from doing some stuff I don’t do — posting videos and other stuff — because I have offended their sensibilities.

Don’t know what they mean, especially since, as an illustration, they showed me someone else’s Facebook post with pictures of Bo Nix and Donald Trump. I recognized the post: I’d seen it and shared it with my mishpocha because Nix (Broncos’ QB) had criticized something Trump had said and I approved.

FB has warned me if I continue this behavior (?), behavior which offends their general community spirit policies (?), I just may be bounced off Facebook altogether.

I dunno. I’m so not flummoxed. If this is a sign of shifting FB policies set in place to protect Trump’s frazzled feelings from our truthful, factual and appropriately nasty comments…well, FB will be going down the tubes very soon. Because if they bounce me and other offensive people off the site, I suspect we’ll all stay bounced.

Let me point out that Facebook is free, but depends upon selling advertising to make money. Advertisers buy space on Facebook depending on how many potential customers Facebook can offer them. If Facebook loses users, advertisers will shave their Facebook ad budget.

And of course — as I keep reminding everyone who complains fearfully to me about how FB, and other social media, know everything about them, is our 21st century Big Browe do not have to buy whatever they’re pushing at us! That’s the whole thing about business, big or small: they are selling their product to us potential consumers and we do not have to buy what they’re selling, even when their algorithms (or whatever) have picked up our casual internet curiosity about, oh, say, one-foot tall platform shoes.

As I typed “going down the tubes” up there , I reminded myself at how irritated I was with Olympic events’ expert commentators whose comments consisted entirely of clichés. Thus, I am checking myself over “going down the tubes.” What tubes? Who first said it?

This is where Perplexity shines light into the darkness:

“Going down the tubes” is an American idiom meaning that something is failing badly, being ruined, or being wasted beyond recovery.

And who first used that expression?

The earliest known use of the idiom “going down the tubes” (in the sense of being wasted, ruined, or lost) appears in print in the mid‑1950s, in a U.S. sports context. One frequently cited early example is from the Charleston Daily Mail in May 1954, in an interview with shot‑putter Parry O’Brien, where the phrase “down the tubes” is used figuratively; many etymologists treat this as the earliest attested citation.

I’m now going to publish this and, per usual, post it on Facebook and Bluesky.

Posted in AI, Culture, Technology, The Facts of Life, Trumpism | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Facebook has slapped at me! How am I feeling?

How crazy is Trump? This crazy…

The first thing I do when I get up is open my digital edition of the New York Times and read it while drinking my coffee.

For a while now, the Times has provided me with a headline regarding something Trump has done or said which causes me to react.

When I write “react,” I do not mean “react” the way most people react, i.e., in horror, rage, etc. My reaction is either low-key (before I’ve had my full coffee dose), usually with that eternal profound question, “Huh?”, or, after fully coffee-ed, loud laughter.

Am I not taking Trump, et al, seriously enough? Well, yes and no.

Seriously, this creature who thinks he’s president is busy manically over-decorating our White House, which is merely his temporary residence — sort of like putting up wallpaper in an AirB&B rental. With linens. I mean, his title is president. But, with the multiple psychopathologies embedded in his character, his sturdily maintained and compleat ignorance, his mental age (maybe 7), and indubitable downward trend in brain and physical functions (how low can he go when he’s starting at 7?), I’m pretty sure Trump’s concept of “president” is not my concept of president.

Also, no — I am not taking Trump seriously. I don’t think he’ll be in office much longer, I don’t think the trash he’s trying to make of our country will take forever to be cleansed and set right, and I do think all of his unconstitutional, illegal, corrupt and criminal activities will bring him and his family and his manager-minions to justice and/or a straitjacket. (Yes, yes, everybody thinks my natural optimism has gone haywire.)

So that’s my attitude when I look through the Times.

Today, there was a rich bonus beyond all expectations. Here was the Trump-related headline in the Times:

President Trump said he planned to send a “great hospital boat” to Greenland.

Burst of laughter, along with, “Huh?” Did something health-related happen in Greenland, something I knew not of?

No. Indeed, Danish officials, apparently as hilariously mystified as I was, headlined in response:

That’s how crazy Trump has become.

But why, out of the blue, did he come up with this particular absurdity? On Bluesky, I picked up this news item from Reuters and a whole bunch of other sources:

NUUK, Feb 21 (Reuters) – Denmark’s Joint Arctic Command said on Saturday it had evacuated a crew member who required urgent medical treatment from a U.S. submarine in Greenlandic waters, seven nautical miles outside of Greenland’s capital Nuuk.

The crew member has been transferred to the Greenlandic health authorities and the hospital in Nuuk, the Joint Arctic Command said in a statement.

So, instead of heartily thanking Denmark for rescuing a sick crewman from one of our submarines, the Trump known as “president” responded with…oh, never mind.

That’s how crazy Trump is.

Posted in The Facts of Life | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on How crazy is Trump? This crazy…

The Cancel Culture War: Stalin v. Trump.

Last week I was at Lincoln Center for a superb all-Shostakovich chamber music program.

Whenever I listen to Shosti (my nickname, regrets, easier to type), I check to see when he composed each work. Was it BS or AS? Or, most wretchedly, DS? To place the work in one of the three categories, the year 1953 is key. It’s when Stalin died. (The first of the three pieces was BS; the next two, AS. Key: BS=before Stalin; AS=after Stalin; DS=during Stalin, but you figured that out, didn’t you?)

Stalin was the kind of guy who liked what he liked and knew what he liked. No arguments. What he didn’t like…well, he stopped everybody from being exposed to what he didn’t like, lest the masses be corrupted by it.

A prime example was Shosti’s awesome opera, Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District. Stalin stomped out of the opera’s first performance in 1936 and immediately thereafter, his kultur kurse on Shosti was laid down. First came Pravda, which issued an editorial condemning “Lady Macbeth as ‘chaos instead of music’ and ‘intentionally unharmonious muddled flow of sounds’ that violated the principles of Socialist Realism.”

Then Stalin’s censorship bureaus stepped in, dutifully coming up with accusatory terminology, elusive enough to sound vaguely high-minded, and meaningless enough to drive the accused artist nuts trying to work out how he or she could correct whatever mistake he’d made that got him culturally cancelled. Because, until “the mistake” was corrected, the artist couldn’t perform or publish the work anywhere. That is, couldn’t eke out a living.

Even BS, Shostakovich was seriously physically ill off and on throughout his life and, to use an appropriately au courant metaphor, Stalin was a virulent anti-vaxxer.

I’ve assembled a partial glossary created by Stalin’s various censorship bureaus used to cancel Shostakovich and other artists’ work:

  • Formalism
  • Petty-bourgeois
  • Abstract
  • Individualistic
  • Dangerous to Soviet culture, a/k/a “Socialist Realism”
  • Destructive to the State.

Stalin’s cancel culture was serious stuff. The threat of ultimate cancellation hovered like a deadly drone over frail Shostakovich’s head for almost twenty years.

Now let’s consider Trump’s efforts to cancel culture he doesn’t like. How many mistakes is he making in his attempts to imitate Stalin? Or Hitler?

Stalin and Hitler were not geniuses but, aside from the paranoia which warped their brains, they were not stupid. Trump is stupid.

Stalin had murderous minions whom he kept loyal, i.e., terrorized, by having the NKVD (KGB predecessor) disappear and liquidate one or two every once in a while. A cleansing process, of sorts.

Instead of loyal minions, Trump has manager-minions, because he is incapable of doing anything himself (see above, re stupid). Despite the general notion that all the Republicans in Congress and the Cabinet are scared of him, the only liquidations I’ve observed have been effected by individual Republicans themselves — by losing elections or otherwise leaving Congress. (I’m terming this action “self-liquidation.”)

However terrifying Trump and his MMs are to our immigrant countryfolk, he hasn’t scared the people of Minnesota or all the other cities where he’s sent his stormtroopers. If you want to scare people, you don’t send an undisciplined mob theatrically costumed as LOTR orcs. And Tom Homan and/or Kristi Noem do not have the, uh — what’s that word? — gravitas of Heinrich Himmler or Lavrentiy Beria.

And Trump’s attempt at creating a Gulag is floundering, thanks to Congresspeople, dedicated non-profit civil rights agencies, journalists and our own loud voices raised in disgust and contempt. (One surprising loud voice is Mississippi Senator Roger Wicker’s. Call it NIMBY, if you will, but it’s still an objection.)

Let’s see. Who else isn’t scared of Trump? A whole heap of judges, states Attorneys General, civil rights lawyers and federal grand juries. Trump’s cabinet hasn’t even managed to deliver a persuasive simulacrum of terror, although their serial TV romcom is succeeding marvelously in buffoonery.

And how about Bad Bunny? Seriously asustado.

But where Trump and his MMs really fail at successful national terrorism — and never forget that everything Trump has done in his life has been a failure, except the 2016 election which was much less of a Trump success than an abject GOP collapse — is in coming up with a condemnatory vocabulary with a smidgen of Soviet pseudo-intellectual panache.

Here’s a short list of Trump’s cancel culture lingo:

  • Real loser
  • Sad
  • Bad
  • Stupid
  • Shithole
  • Nasty
  • Fake
  • “A total disaster, really, really terrible, just a disaster.”

Oh wow. Totally scares me to death. And it must have scared away all the prominent artists from performing at the Kennedy Center — oh wait! Trump didn’t “cancel” them; they canceled Trump. They themselves are performing elsewhere. A total Trump screw-up. Their cancellations forced Trump to shut down the Kennedy Center.

I can hear the ghost of Stalin saying, “Huh?”

 

Posted in The Facts of Life | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Cancel Culture War: Stalin v. Trump.