Search all posts
-
Most Recent Posts
Sites of Interest
Category Archives: Guns in the U.S. of A.
Should parents bear criminal responsibility for their killer kids?
Today the New York Times takes up a country-wide discussion about how much responsibility parents have when their armed scions kill. A few days ago, as part of an aspirational piece about how we can add further controls to our … Continue reading
Posted in Guns in the U.S. of A., Law, suits and order, The Facts of Life
Tagged Adam Lanza, gun violence, Nancy Lanza, parents and guns, Sandy Hook massacre
Comments Off on Should parents bear criminal responsibility for their killer kids?
Guns — further restrictions.
Way back in — good grief could it be 2012? Yes — in 2012, I published a characteristically sarcastic essay about guns in America, culminating in a new law I called, “The One Gun One Child Act.” This was six … Continue reading
Posted in Government, Guns in the U.S. of A., Law, suits and order, The Facts of Life
Tagged Carolinas guns, Clarence Thomas, Florida guns, Georgia guns, gun control, gun ownership insurance, gun regulation, guns banned, GW Bridge, Holland Tunnel, Kathy Hochul, Kentucky Guns, Lincoln Tunnel, Mann Act, New York State gun regulations, Sandy Hook, SCOTUS, sensitive areas, US 95, Virginia guns
Comments Off on Guns — further restrictions.
How can we confront this bizarre, destructive SCOTUS?
One word answer: Bedazzled. I had a lot of gun control ideas along this line but the New York State Legislature beat me to it — at amazing speed. Still, I want to offer the Bedazzled lesson as lanolin* for … Continue reading
Posted in climate change, Corruption, Guns in the U.S. of A., Human rights, Judiciary, Law, suits and order, Politics, Pro choice, The Facts of Life, The god problem, voting and voting rights, War on women
Tagged Article I of the Constitution, Bedazzled, constitutional crisis, Dudley Moore, Eleanor Bron, Guarantee Clause, Jamelle Bouie, lanolin, Peter Cook, Supreme Court
Comments Off on How can we confront this bizarre, destructive SCOTUS?